Analysis of the status of international and domestic security service industry
Analysis of the status of international and domestic security service industry Networking alarm service This international security model with a history of more than 50 years originates from developed countries such as Japan, Europe and the United States, among which the most representative companies are Japan¡¯s Seacom and United Nations International. Coordinating and Coordinating Bureau, their service agencies throughout the world. They all have a complete industrial system, from market-oriented R&D and production of hardware and software products to the establishment of specialized intelligence agencies, collecting worldwide social trends, technological trends and unrest factors and difficulties in various social systems. In order to provide a series of high-quality security services in response to various needs in the society, a whole set of scientific, efficient, and reliable integrated, systematic, and industrialized service frameworks have been formed.
The networked alarm service has a history of more than ten years in China, and a large number of service operators have emerged throughout the country. At present, the market is mainly characterized by: Listed security service companies whose main operations are franchises, due to opportunistic tendencies, With eagerness for quick success and development, and focusing on the market for research and development, products and technologies are often subject to human control. The subsequent development is sluggish, and the market gradually shrinks, even to the point of delisting. The service providers of large-scale cities in the first-tier cities pursued acquisitionism and all imported products were technologically resistant. The model was copied and copied simply. With the intensification of vicious competition in the market and the continuous increase in the cost of labor, the profit rate was getting lower and lower, and the development bottleneck It is highlighted that the desire to be stronger and bigger is difficult to achieve.
The alarm service providers in the second and third-tier markets can be described as mixed. Most of the alarm service concepts are not in place or regional market competition has not yet formed. The market development is not yet sufficient, and the customer base is single. Most of them struggle at the break-even point; small regional markets are fully developed. Although market competition is fierce, market excavation is in-depth and comprehensive, and the situation is gratifying. It belongs to the most powerful force in China's security service market. However, due to the long-term use of low-end, domestically-produced products and backward communication methods, with access to network users Increased, due to product performance and features brought about by the more and more prominent, and the negative impact on business has become increasingly evident.
The contrast between international and domestic is obvious. The biggest difference is that China¡¯s alarm service industry is in a state of separation between R&D production and service operations, that is to say, production is not operated, and operations are not produced. This situation will result in three disadvantages. First, it cannot produce comprehensive security companies that are "strong and specialized" like Siccom and ADT. Second, it is a long period of time due to the disconnect between R&D and production concepts and operational service concepts. Within the country, it is difficult to produce high-quality products that substitute imports. The domestic market for high-quality security services has to be the world of imported products. Third, the production enterprises that focus on the production of civilian non-network-type low-end alarm products will be squeezed by the networked alarm market. Continued downturn until exiting the stage of history.
The networked alarm service has a history of more than ten years in China, and a large number of service operators have emerged throughout the country. At present, the market is mainly characterized by: Listed security service companies whose main operations are franchises, due to opportunistic tendencies, With eagerness for quick success and development, and focusing on the market for research and development, products and technologies are often subject to human control. The subsequent development is sluggish, and the market gradually shrinks, even to the point of delisting. The service providers of large-scale cities in the first-tier cities pursued acquisitionism and all imported products were technologically resistant. The model was copied and copied simply. With the intensification of vicious competition in the market and the continuous increase in the cost of labor, the profit rate was getting lower and lower, and the development bottleneck It is highlighted that the desire to be stronger and bigger is difficult to achieve.
The alarm service providers in the second and third-tier markets can be described as mixed. Most of the alarm service concepts are not in place or regional market competition has not yet formed. The market development is not yet sufficient, and the customer base is single. Most of them struggle at the break-even point; small regional markets are fully developed. Although market competition is fierce, market excavation is in-depth and comprehensive, and the situation is gratifying. It belongs to the most powerful force in China's security service market. However, due to the long-term use of low-end, domestically-produced products and backward communication methods, with access to network users Increased, due to product performance and features brought about by the more and more prominent, and the negative impact on business has become increasingly evident.
The contrast between international and domestic is obvious. The biggest difference is that China¡¯s alarm service industry is in a state of separation between R&D production and service operations, that is to say, production is not operated, and operations are not produced. This situation will result in three disadvantages. First, it cannot produce comprehensive security companies that are "strong and specialized" like Siccom and ADT. Second, it is a long period of time due to the disconnect between R&D and production concepts and operational service concepts. Within the country, it is difficult to produce high-quality products that substitute imports. The domestic market for high-quality security services has to be the world of imported products. Third, the production enterprises that focus on the production of civilian non-network-type low-end alarm products will be squeezed by the networked alarm market. Continued downturn until exiting the stage of history.